That little voice in your head is not always the Holy Spirit

December 21, 2005

“I couldn’t put my finger on it, but something just didn’t seem right…”

“I’m not sure what it was, but something was just off…”

These are two statements that I have heard or read numerous times. Usually, on a blog or in its comments, the person is referring to their first impression or opinion of a book, theology, denomination, church service, person, etc. It’s statement that says, “there is a red flag here and we need to think this whole thing through.”

When we are in places that are new, different and uncomfortable to us these thoughts obviously normal. I don’t know how many times I have read type of statement in the comments on blogs that are taking a stand against some “new” theology or different form of church.

I think too often (not always), we take these thoughts and feelings and then simply stop thinking. The thought process goes something like this:

1. This is different.

2. This doesn’t feel right.

3. This is wrong.

I’d like to propose a different way of processing things we come across that are new and different.

What if we simply added a few lines here…

1. This is different (unless we are hermits, we’ll find ourselves here)

2. This doesn’t feel right. (this is legitimate, new almost always doesn’t “feel right.”)

2a. Does it not feel right because there is something morally wrong here?

2b. Does it not feel right because there is something obviously biblically wrong here?

2c. Does it not feel right mainly because this is different to me and I am not used to it.

2d. Did really hear what this person was saying or are we speaking the same words but in two different languages.

3. This might be right / wrong. (Only after we have take a good look at ourselves, our traditions and finally the text can we even begin to declare something right or wrong. I say “might be” because more often than not, the area is a gray area that is, well, gray. Of course, this is not to say that there are not black and white issues, but most often they are).

So often, I think we take our first impression (or we hear someone say something and we think we “know what they meant”) and shut down our brains.

“Something doesn’t feel right” is not a valid reason to call something “unbiblical” or “heretical.” These kinds of words are very, very strong indictments towards the family of Christ. They should be used ever so lightly.

It’s okay not to like something “just because” it is different. Of course, everyone is entitled to their own opinion and can like whatever they want. But to declare something as “wrong” because something seems off, without taking a look at your own baggage, is plain wrong.

That little voice in your head is not always the Holy Spirit… sometimes its your own bias and fears…

(what do you think? This make sense? Am I missing something here?)

Recent Comments // only me talking would be just plain silly.

  • Kevin said...

    1

    12/21/05 6:08 AM | Comment Link |

    Todd, good point I aggree. I can be close-mindedness and “fearful” of what’s different. I had shut out a certain author who writes christian “dating advice” books. I told my self I would never read that stuff. But, I made that judgement knowing little or nothing about the author or what he has to say. I had to check myself and open my mind to see that there may be some value in his books. Even if I don’t take all of it as gospel (not that I should do that with any book)

  • Tim said...

    2

    12/22/05 7:23 AM | Comment Link |

    I think that people, (Christians in particular) always tend to see things in black and white. The problem I face daily is whether to go along with today’s “good for you not for me” attitude or universalism. While I want to love my neighbor it’s hard not to fall into this attitude and maintain that there is ONE truth the ONE way to eternal life. There is a great article recently published on relevantmagazine.com (How to dismantle an idolized Bono) that’s caused a lot of ruckus.

  • Todd said...

    3

    12/22/05 7:31 AM | Comment Link |

    Tim,
    i read the article, seems Bono was taken out of context here. I have seen him quote many, many times talking about the uniqueness of Jesus. While he is not a conservative evangelical he is definately a follow of jesus.

    i read this another blog:

    “Tara’s article is flawed because that was simply a misquote of Bono. Apparently he was saying, “Jesus, Jew, Mohammed, it’s true…all sons of Abraham.” And Bono’s call to coexistance was more of a plea for the people of the world’s 3 major religions to stop killing each other, instead of a call to radical universalism.”

    Anyways, i agree, there is a balance between desiring to maintain the uniqueness of Jesus and yet still be in dialogue and true friendships with those who don’t hold the same to be true. funny, i have found very few people who decide who their friends are based on what their potential friend might believe. hopefully friendship goes deeper than that and is a little more about…well…friendship.

    its a good tension to live in…

Say Something // or say nothing, just don't spam me.

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Post info // the posts' vital signs

This post has 3 comment(s) and was posted on December 21, 2005 in the following category(ies):

Related Posts // i'm not a one-trick-pony but there is a good chance I've written something similar.

Published Articles // okay. so i should really say "article."